Labs dominicreichl.com

For people who prepare sensitive PDFs

A black rectangle can hide the page and still expose the information.

RedactionGuard is a proposed local-first checker for anyone who prepares sensitive PDFs and needs a repeatable final review before sharing. It would surface content and document structures that visual inspection alone can miss.

Request reviewer accessSee how it works

Concept validation only. No payment, no commitment, no recurring newsletter.

Local-first directionPortable outputsBuilt around a specific workflowEarly access is free

Proposed workflow

Check the finished file, not just what the page appears to show.

The proposed workflow focuses on concrete PDF failure modes and gives the reviewer a short list of findings to inspect before distribution.

01

Surface recoverable content

Flag selectable text, objects, annotations, and layers that may still reveal information beneath or around a visual redaction.

02

Inspect metadata locally

Review document properties and embedded structures on the workstation so sensitive source material does not need to be uploaded.

03

Create a review summary

Record which automated checks ran and which findings still need a person’s judgment before the document is sent.

The honest status

This is a product decision, not a finished product.

The concept is being validated before development time is committed. Joining tells us the problem is relevant to you and gives you first access if the evidence supports a build.

  • You will not be charged.
  • Your email is only used for this experiment.
  • You can leave the list at any time.

Before you decide

Questions, answered clearly.

The current scope, privacy model, and next step without launch-day promises.

Can I use RedactionGuard today?

No. This page validates whether a focused local verification tool solves a meaningful enough problem to build.

Would sensitive PDFs be uploaded?

The intended product direction is local-first. Source and output PDFs should remain on the workstation used for review.

Would a clean result guarantee that a PDF is safe to release?

No. Automated checks can surface known technical risks, but they cannot replace context-aware human review, organizational policy, or legal approval.

What happens when I request access?

Your email is recorded for this experiment only. You will receive one relevant update or beta invitation if the concept moves forward.

Early access

Would a repeatable final check reduce uncertainty in your PDF workflow?

Request early access if you can evaluate the proposed checks on realistic redaction scenarios. Your feedback would help define which findings are useful and which only create noise.